Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

2140

reference
75-tree-1
name
2140
tree-preservation-order

undefined

75-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.006654 50.891921)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.006597 50.891915,-1.006599 50.891927,-1.006607 50.891937,-1.006620 50.891945,-1.006636 50.891950,-1.006653 50.891952,-1.006671 50.891950,-1.006687 50.891945,-1.006699 50.891937,-1.006708 50.891928,-1.006711 50.891916,-1.006708 50.891905,-1.006700 50.891895,-1.006688 50.891887,-1.006672 50.891882,-1.006655 50.891880,-1.006637 50.891882,-1.006621 50.891887,-1.006608 50.891894,-1.006600 50.891904,-1.006597 50.891915)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL